[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#65912: 2023-08-31; Fix xref errors when matching in unvisited files
From: |
Ikumi Keita |
Subject: |
bug#65912: 2023-08-31; Fix xref errors when matching in unvisited files |
Date: |
Fri, 15 Sep 2023 14:45:17 +0900 |
Hi David, thanks for raising these issues.
>>>>> David Fussner via bug-auctex via Bug reporting list for AUCTeX
>>>>> <bug-auctex@gnu.org> writes:
> I enclose a patch (0001), which puts the required call, with a comment, at
> the end of font-latex-set-syntactic-keywords, which seems to work for
> all the AUCTeX modes, but there may be a better place for it.
1. This breaks doctex fontification. Doctex mode calls
`font-latex-setup' twice; once in `VirTeX-common-initialization',
once in `docTeX-mode'. Since the first one calls
`font-lock-set-defaults' which sets the variable
`font-lock-set-defaults' to t (and `major-mode' isn't `doctex-mode'
yet), the second call to `font-lock-set-defaults' does nothing and
doctex specific fontification isn't taken into account.
Adding
(setq font-lock-set-defaults nil)
before (funcall TeX-install-font-lock) in `docTeX-mode' addresses
this problem.
2. I think better place for `(font-lock-set-defaults)' is
`font-latex-setup' rather than `font-latex-set-syntactic-keywords';
the latter is sometimes called afterwards by AUCTeX style files.
I modified your proposal to make the attached patch. This fixes your
first bug keeping the doctex fontification.
> If you apply patch 0001, and make sure font-latex.el is reloaded, you
> can then see the next bug: in specific cases, xref-find-references
> reports a hit only in visited files, despite there being identical text
> in the unvisited one.
I confirmed the reported result.
> The attached patch (0002) parses and applies styles in the temp
> buffer, and only in such non-file-visiting buffers. It does so both in
> LaTeX-common-initialization and in plain-TeX-common-initialization,
> which I think covers all the modes.
It seems reasonable basically. However, this makes two regression tests
fail:
2 unexpected results:
FAILED LaTeX-filling
FAILED LaTeX-style-hook-with-class-option
I thought the following advice in latex-test.el is interfering badly:
----------------------------------------------------------------------
;; We need to ensure that font-lock has put the syntax properties
;; already which won't happen in batch mode. So trigger font-lock
;; immediately.
(define-advice LaTeX-common-initialization (:after ())
(font-lock-ensure))
----------------------------------------------------------------------
However, the failures remain even after I deleted this advice. I haven't
figured out what's going on yet. (Maybe the failures only appear in
batch mode and aren't real issues.) Does anyone out there have insights?
Regards,
Ikumi Keita
#StandWithUkraine #StopWarInUkraine
patch
Description: revised patch
- bug#65912: 2023-08-31; Fix xref errors when matching in unvisited files, David Fussner, 2023/09/13
- bug#65912: 2023-08-31; Fix xref errors when matching in unvisited files, David Fussner, 2023/09/14
- bug#65912: 2023-08-31; Fix xref errors when matching in unvisited files,
Ikumi Keita <=
- bug#65912: 2023-08-31; Fix xref errors when matching in unvisited files, David Fussner, 2023/09/15
- bug#65912: 2023-08-31; Fix xref errors when matching in unvisited files, Ikumi Keita, 2023/09/17
- bug#65912: 2023-08-31; Fix xref errors when matching in unvisited files, David Fussner, 2023/09/17
- bug#65912: 2023-08-31; Fix xref errors when matching in unvisited files, David Fussner, 2023/09/17
- bug#65912: 2023-08-31; Fix xref errors when matching in unvisited files, Ikumi Keita, 2023/09/19
- bug#65912: 2023-08-31; Fix xref errors when matching in unvisited files, David Fussner, 2023/09/19