[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#61400: Different filling for verbatim macros
From: |
Ikumi Keita |
Subject: |
bug#61400: Different filling for verbatim macros |
Date: |
Tue, 14 Feb 2023 15:46:53 +0900 |
Hi Arash,
>>>>> Arash Esbati <arash@gnu.org> writes:
> Do we really want this? My gut feeling is to have `LaTeX-verbatim-p'
> returns t just before the "\verb|...|" etc., i.e., when cursor is over
> the backslash.
OK, then another candidate is the attached patch. This keeps the current
behavior of `LaTeX-verbatim-p' and introduces a new function
`LaTeX-verbatim-nobreak-p' as you suggested in your previous message.
However, I'm a bit reluctant.
1. If `LaTeX-verbatim-p' should return non-nil at just before
"\verb", then it should also do so just before "\begin{verbatim}" for
consistency, shouldn't it?
2. Suppose that you type "$" just before "\verb...". Then
`TeX-insert-dollar' inserts only one "$" instead of "$$" under the
current behavior of `LaTeX-verbatim-p', because `TeX-insert-dollar'
uses `TeX-verbatim-p'. I think it's unexpected.
> Thanks, LGTM. One other complication we have to deal with is that \Verb
> from fancyvrb or \lstinline from listings can have an optional argument,
> e.g.:
> \Verb[fontsize=\scriptsize]|foo bar|
Thanks, I incorporated it with slight modification in the attached patch.
>> +;; (defun LaTeX-current-verbatim-macro ()
>> +;; "Return name of verbatim macro containing point, nil if none is
>> present."
>> +;; (let ((macro-boundaries (LaTeX-verbatim-macro-boundaries)))
>> +;; (when macro-boundaries
>> +;; (save-excursion
>> +;; (goto-char (car macro-boundaries))
>> +;; (forward-char (length TeX-esc))
>> +;; (buffer-substring-no-properties
>> +;; (point) (progn (skip-chars-forward "@A-Za-z*") (point)))))))
> Would it make sense to keep the above as a utility function?
This time I leave that function as is.
> And while we're at it: The docstring isn't correct any more, right? I
> mean this part:
> It doesn't regard the point just before \\verb... etc. belongs to
> the verbatim macro. This isn't symmetric with
> `TeX-find-macro-boundaries'.
In my previous patch, it's correct because I removed the chunk
(if (looking-at (concat (regexp-quote TeX-esc) verbatim-regexp))
(forward-char 1)
from `LaTeX-verbatim-macro-boundaries'. :-)
(By the way, I noticed that `LaTeX-verbatim-p' raises error when "\verb"
is at the end of the buffer without delimiters and its contents "|...|".
In fact `LaTeX-verbatim-macro-boundaries' and
`LaTeX-current-verbatim-macro' raise the same error. The reason is that
`LaTeX-verbatim-macro-boundaries' presumes there is nonempty string
after the macro body. Should we cater for such corner case?)
Best,
Ikumi Keita
#StandWithUkraine #StopWarInUkraine
patch
Description: keep current LaTeX-verbatim-p
- bug#61400: Different filling for verbatim macros, (continued)
- bug#61400: Different filling for verbatim macros, Tassilo Horn, 2023/02/10
- bug#61400: Different filling for verbatim macros, Arash Esbati, 2023/02/10
- bug#61400: Different filling for verbatim macros, Tassilo Horn, 2023/02/10
- bug#61400: Different filling for verbatim macros, Ikumi Keita, 2023/02/10
- bug#61400: Different filling for verbatim macros, Arash Esbati, 2023/02/10
- bug#61400: Different filling for verbatim macros, Ikumi Keita, 2023/02/11
- bug#61400: Different filling for verbatim macros, Arash Esbati, 2023/02/12
- bug#61400: Different filling for verbatim macros, Ikumi Keita, 2023/02/12
- bug#61400: Different filling for verbatim macros, Ikumi Keita, 2023/02/13
- bug#61400: Different filling for verbatim macros, Arash Esbati, 2023/02/13
- bug#61400: Different filling for verbatim macros,
Ikumi Keita <=
- bug#61400: Different filling for verbatim macros, Arash Esbati, 2023/02/14
- bug#61400: Different filling for verbatim macros, Ikumi Keita, 2023/02/15
- bug#61400: Different filling for verbatim macros, Arash Esbati, 2023/02/15
- bug#61400: Different filling for verbatim macros, Ikumi Keita, 2023/02/15
- bug#61400: Different filling for verbatim macros, Arash Esbati, 2023/02/15
- bug#61400: Different filling for verbatim macros, Ikumi Keita, 2023/02/16
- bug#61400: Different filling for verbatim macros, Arash Esbati, 2023/02/16
- bug#61400: Different filling for verbatim macros, Ikumi Keita, 2023/02/16
- bug#61400: Different filling for verbatim macros, Arash Esbati, 2023/02/16