[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#39927: 12.2; preview-latex gs treatment off by one
From: |
David Kastrup |
Subject: |
bug#39927: 12.2; preview-latex gs treatment off by one |
Date: |
Thu, 05 Mar 2020 16:42:02 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
address@hidden writes:
> Hello,
>
> Funny bug with preview-latex. I use gs 9.50 with
> preview-pdf-color-adjust-method = t.
>
> Whenever generating previews, I get error messages for essentially all
> preview images, such as:
> « Cannot find image file ‘.../_region_.prv/.../pr1-1.png’ »
>
> Then, one preview image (first one in document order, last one to be treated,
> if I understood things correctly) fails to load, just get a big blank square.
> Move the cursor a bit, and it loads as well. Particularly annoying if you
> are just refreshing a single preview image and it fails to load.
>
> My diagnosis : in parsing the GS output, preview-gs-transact just assumes
> that some prompts from GS mean that an image has been treated. I **guess**
> the introduction of -dDELAYBIND could have added an extra such prompt, so now
> it assumes the image is ready before it actually is. emacs complains it
> cannot be found. Then when adding the next image to its overlay, emacs
> realises that the previous image is there now, and loads it, so in the end,
> it is only the last image to be loaded that is missing, but error messages
> are displayed for all.
>
> Possible solution : it **seems** that GS outputs GS<1> when it has treated an
> image, and GS> when it has, well, done I am not sure what. So instead of
> just counting all prompts and just skip one as current code seems to do, I
> would suggest to ignore the GS> prompts.
> The following code does this, and solves the problem (for me).
> Cheers,
That doesn't seem right. GS> means that Ghostscript is waiting for
input. GS<1> means that Ghostscript is waiting for input and there is
one item left on its stack (which is where PostScript passes data
around). I don't think that this should regularly be the case.
--
David Kastrup