[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Bug-AUCTeX] [RFH] Debian reported upstream bugs
From: |
Tassilo Horn |
Subject: |
Re: [Bug-AUCTeX] [RFH] Debian reported upstream bugs |
Date: |
Sun, 02 Nov 2014 20:58:12 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.130012 (Ma Gnus v0.12) Emacs/25.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
"Davide G. M. Salvetti" <address@hidden>
writes:
> MG> #120031 auctex: Prompts do not inherit input-method
> MG> with commit
> MG>
> http://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/auctex.git/commit/?id=6d14dade82c9b8e4f56eb216bcf9761ca6b3fa63but
> MG> just a few occurrences of `read-string' have been replaced with
> MG> `TeX-read-string'
>
> About this commit, I would like to ask to David a clarification about
> what «wherever it may be appropriate» means: would it be wrong to just
> s/read-string/TeX-read-string/g?
I think that's hardly decidable. Basically, I'd argue that we should
always use `TeX-read-string' when free text is read (because I might
write greek) and `read-string' when fixed things like float positions or
sizes are read (because those are plain ASCII).
Bye,
Tassilo