[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Bug-AUCTeX] 11.86; preview confused by beamer+xelatex
From: |
Giacomo Boffi |
Subject: |
Re: [Bug-AUCTeX] 11.86; preview confused by beamer+xelatex |
Date: |
Mon, 11 Apr 2011 13:43:45 +0200 |
Ralf Angeli writes:
> * Giacomo Boffi (2011-03-27) writes:
>
> > Ralf Angeli writes:
hi Ralf, sorry for the late reply
> > > It looks like the document class or some package sets \pdfoutput.
> > > There is even a warning about this by the ifpdf package in the log.
> > > If \pdfoutput is set, preview.sty assumes that PDFLaTeX is used.
> > > It then checks the value of \pdfoutput in order to find out if PDF
> > > output is produced. In your example the value is 0, so preview.sty
> > > comes to the conclusion that DVI output is produced. And that's
> > > why preview-latex then calls dvips.
> > >
> > > I didn't look by whom \pdfoutput is set to 0, but this looks a bit
> > > fishy. Do you happen to know where and why this is done?
> >
> > i don't, sorry
>
> It looks like beamer.cls does this itself:
>
> ,----[ from beamer.cls ]
> | %
> | % Ensure that \pdfoutput is defined. Might be removed at some point.
> | %
> | address@hidden \newcount\pdfoutput \fi
> | \ifx\pdfoutput\relax \newcount\pdfoutput \fi
> `----
as i came to the same conclusion i submitted a bug report to the
beamer development, no reply as yet...
> > > In any case, either the document class or some package loads
> > > hyperref and recent versions of it are incompatible with
> > > preview.sty. So even if we can get rid of the \pdfoutput
> > > problem, you won't have much joy with this combination.
> >
> > my debian has texlive 2009, so newest releases of hyperref shouldn't
> > cast too dark a shadow on my texing...
>
> I think the incompatibility already exists in this release. I'm
> using the same version of TeX Live and when I load hyperref in
> circ.tex (the preview-latex showcase), preview-latex complains that
> it found no previews. At least when it is run on the document.
> Running it at point oddly seems to work.
my environment should be different, because i routinely run C-c C-p
C-d and everything is fine
thank you very much, ciao
gb
--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.