[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Bug-AUCTeX] 11.85; Biblatex vs. RefTex
From: |
Andreas Breitbach |
Subject: |
Re: [Bug-AUCTeX] 11.85; Biblatex vs. RefTex |
Date: |
Fri, 26 Jun 2009 23:35:35 +0200 |
Am Freitag, den 26.06.2009, 21:58 +0200 schrieb Ralf Angeli:
> * Andreas Breitbach (2009-06-26) writes:
>
> > Am Freitag, den 26.06.2009, 18:25 +0200 schrieb Ralf Angeli:
> >>
> >> So I presume there is now the directory
> >> /usr/local/share/emacs/site-lisp/reftex which contains RefTeX's Elisp
> >> files?
> > Yes: address@hidden:/usr/local/share/emacs/site-lisp/reftex$ ls -al
> > -rw-r--r-- 1 root staff 8249 2009-06-26 11:01 reftex.el
> > (I deleted some files from the list due to readability)
>
> Only reftex.el would be a bit disconcerting, so I suppose the other .el
> and .elc files can be found there as well.
Yes, that's the case.
> >> What's the output of `C-h v load-path <RET>'?
> > load-path is a variable defined in `C source code'.
> > Its value is
> > ("/usr/share/emacs/site-lisp/auctex"
> [...]
> > "/usr/local/share/emacs/22.2/site-lisp"
> > "/usr/local/share/emacs/site-lisp"
> [...]
> > (Manual line breaks applied by me, also due to better readability)
>
> The directory with the newly installed RefTeX files is missing. Please
> read the installation instructions in their entirety.
Oops, I missed that one when tiding up .emacs. Now it's there:
(add-to-list 'load-path "/usr/local/share/emacs/site-lisp/reftex")(and
also showing up at the first position in "C-h v load-path <RET>" and the
"M-x locate-library <RET> reftex-base <RET>" also gives "Library is
file /usr/local/share/emacs/site-lisp/reftex/reftex.el"
), but I get "RefTeX version 4.31" on "C-h v reftex-version <RET>".
And I also have the same output on "M-x list-load-path-shadows <RET>" as
I sent along somewhat before:
/usr/local/share/emacs/site-lisp/reftex/reftex-index
hides /usr/share/emacs/22.2/lisp/textmodes/reftex-index
/usr/local/share/emacs/site-lisp/reftex/reftex-sel
hides /usr/share/emacs/22.2/lisp/textmodes/reftex-sel
/usr/local/share/emacs/site-lisp/reftex/reftex-toc
hides /usr/share/emacs/22.2/lisp/textmodes/reftex-toc
/usr/local/share/emacs/site-lisp/reftex/reftex-dcr
hides /usr/share/emacs/22.2/lisp/textmodes/reftex-dcr
/usr/local/share/emacs/site-lisp/reftex/reftex-global
hides /usr/share/emacs/22.2/lisp/textmodes/reftex-global
/usr/local/share/emacs/site-lisp/reftex/reftex-cite
hides /usr/share/emacs/22.2/lisp/textmodes/reftex-cite
/usr/local/share/emacs/site-lisp/reftex/reftex-auc
hides /usr/share/emacs/22.2/lisp/textmodes/reftex-auc
/usr/local/share/emacs/site-lisp/reftex/reftex
hides /usr/share/emacs/22.2/lisp/textmodes/reftex
/usr/local/share/emacs/site-lisp/reftex/reftex-ref
hides /usr/share/emacs/22.2/lisp/textmodes/reftex-ref
/usr/local/share/emacs/site-lisp/reftex/reftex-parse
hides /usr/share/emacs/22.2/lisp/textmodes/reftex-parse
/usr/local/share/emacs/site-lisp/reftex/reftex-vars
hides /usr/share/emacs/22.2/lisp/textmodes/reftex-vars
Before producing the aforementioned outputs, I reinstalled RefTeX and
Emacs as mentioned before.
C-c [ doesn't work, of course, but giving me a Backtrace with M-x
toggle-debug-on-error(it seems to be the same output as I sent on
Tuesday, I attached the new one, being called Backtrace2).
So far, that's it. By now, I assume there's some error outside of what I
can account for.
Backtrace2
Description: Binary data
- Re: [Bug-AUCTeX] 11.85; Biblatex vs. RefTex, (continued)
- Re: [Bug-AUCTeX] 11.85; Biblatex vs. RefTex, Andreas Breitbach, 2009/06/19
- Re: [Bug-AUCTeX] 11.85; Biblatex vs. RefTex, Ralf Angeli, 2009/06/21
- Message not available
- Re: [Bug-AUCTeX] 11.85; Biblatex vs. RefTex, Andreas Breitbach, 2009/06/23
- Re: [Bug-AUCTeX] 11.85; Biblatex vs. RefTex, Ralf Angeli, 2009/06/23
- Re: [Bug-AUCTeX] 11.85; Biblatex vs. RefTex, Andreas Breitbach, 2009/06/25
- Re: [Bug-AUCTeX] 11.85; Biblatex vs. RefTex, Ralf Angeli, 2009/06/25
- Re: [Bug-AUCTeX] 11.85; Biblatex vs. RefTex, Andreas Breitbach, 2009/06/26
- Re: [Bug-AUCTeX] 11.85; Biblatex vs. RefTex, Ralf Angeli, 2009/06/26
- Re: [Bug-AUCTeX] 11.85; Biblatex vs. RefTex, Andreas Breitbach, 2009/06/26
- Re: [Bug-AUCTeX] 11.85; Biblatex vs. RefTex, Ralf Angeli, 2009/06/26
- Re: [Bug-AUCTeX] 11.85; Biblatex vs. RefTex,
Andreas Breitbach <=
- Re: [Bug-AUCTeX] 11.85; Biblatex vs. RefTex, Ralf Angeli, 2009/06/27
- Re: [Bug-AUCTeX] 11.85; Biblatex vs. RefTex, Andreas Breitbach, 2009/06/27
- Re: [Bug-AUCTeX] 11.85; Biblatex vs. RefTex, Ralf Angeli, 2009/06/27
- Message not available
- Re: [Bug-AUCTeX] 11.85; Biblatex vs. RefTex, Ralf Angeli, 2009/06/27
- Re: [Bug-AUCTeX] 11.85; Biblatex vs. RefTex, Andreas Breitbach, 2009/06/27