[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH 1/4] style: add missing copyright headers
From: |
Akim Demaille |
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH 1/4] style: add missing copyright headers |
Date: |
Tue, 26 Jan 2021 06:54:21 +0100 |
Hans,
Sorry, I forgot to answer about this.
> Le 20 déc. 2020 à 18:25, Hans Åberg <haberg-1@telia.com> a écrit :
>
>> On 20 Dec 2020, at 11:15, Akim Demaille <akim.demaille@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>> Le 19 déc. 2020 à 11:06, Hans Åberg <haberg-1@telia.com> a écrit :
>>>
>>> Though by the nature of examples, you may not want to add a copyright
>>> notice on them: As special cases of something more general, they may not be
>>> sufficiently creatively unique to be copyrightable, and in addition, you
>>> may want people to use them without a worry of copyrighting.
>>
>> You have a point, but that discussion already took place and was settled
>> down with Paul.
>>
>> https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bison-patches/2020-07/msg00010.html
>
> I can't see the discussion on your link,
Yes, it was not public.
> but the recommendation is here [1]. In general, one should put license
> notices just in case, so that they are not treated as though being public
> domain, I think.
>
> 1.
> https://www.gnu.org/prep/maintain/html_node/License-Notices-for-Code-Examples.html
Here are the relevant parts of our discussion.
> Le 4 juil. 2020 à 17:54, Paul Eggert <eggert@cs.ucla.edu> a écrit :
>
> On 7/4/20 8:07 AM, Akim Demaille wrote:
>> Bison's examples are getting larger, they are no longer smallish. Yet they
>> don't have the usual license comments, because I never thought about what
>> license to give them...
>>
>> What license would you recommend?
>
> https://www.gnu.org/prep/maintain/html_node/License-Notices-for-Code-Examples.html
>
> suggests using the GPL for anything longer than 40 lines. Or are you asking
> about the exact details for how to do this? I'd look to see how Emacs does
> it....
> Le 6 juil. 2020 à 22:15, Paul Eggert <eggert@cs.ucla.edu> a écrit :
>
> On 7/5/20 10:08 PM, Akim Demaille wrote:
>> So you'd go with the GPL?
>
> Yes. It's a better default, for the GNU project anyway. If someone asks for a
> different license we can revisit this later.
[Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread] |
- Re: [PATCH 1/4] style: add missing copyright headers,
Akim Demaille <=