Re: dlang: initial changes to run the calc tests on it

[Akim Demaille]

[Hi HS.  Sorry, I just discovered this message right now, under
a pile of other windows...  I don't know why it was not sent.
Did you have chances to work on the D skeleton since then?]

> Le 1 mars 2019 à 20:01, H. S. Teoh <address@hidden> a écrit :
> 
> [Btw, no need to Cc: me in replies, as I'm subscribed to bison-patches]
> 
> On Fri, Mar 01, 2019 at 06:46:43AM +0100, Akim Demaille wrote:
>> Hi!
>> 
>>> Le 1 mars 2019 à 03:10, H. S. Teoh <address@hidden> a écrit :
> [...]
>>> In the ideal case, the lexer would simply be a struct that wraps
>>> around an arbitrary input range of characters.  In order to make
>>> things work with the current code, though, I conceded to make
>>> CalcLexer a class that implements Lexer.  We can change that when we
>>> get around to moving away from lexer classes.
> [...]
>> The version you sent works, thanks!  Is it ok if I install it under
>> your name?  The work is yours, not mine:  (add there's a question
>> for you afterwards).
> 
> That's fine.

Ok.  I have updated my changes with some of yours, but not all.
In particular, you keep on using YYTokenType as return value for
yylex, but I changed it recently to int in the skeleton.  You
probably need to update your repo.

> So it's really a judgment call whether we should stick to GCS or to
> Phobos style.  I have no strong opinions either way. (Though I have to
> admit, 2-space indentation is a bit extreme... I can work with it,
> though.  I used to write Perl with 3-space indentation, and I *have*
> seen code with 1-space indentation before. So it's not that big of a
> deal.)

So it will be simpler to stick to the GCS everywhere in the repo.
I never used something else than 2 or 4-space indentation :)  3
sounds super weird to me :)  (even when I was writing Perl, I
did it the GCS way).


Cheers!