Re: RFC: c++: provide control over the stack.hh file name

[Akim Demaille]

> Le 28 sept. 2018 à 10:35, Hans Åberg <address@hidden> a écrit :
> 
> 
>> On 28 Sep 2018, at 07:06, Akim Demaille <address@hidden> wrote:
>> 
>> Do you think it’s useful?  We used to use deques in the generated
>> parser, but in 
>> http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bison-patches/2013-01/msg00010.html
>> we moved to vector because I don’t see what it buys us.  Sure, it
>> saves us from occasional copies when the vector grows, but that’s
>> all.  At the cost of more indirections.
> 
> For types that can't be copied or moved, or does not have move, the deque 
> might be desirable. Don’t know about that in this context, but a search shows 
> that such things are out there.

I know, that’s why we chose deques initially.  But in reality, given
that we have to copy (or move) to/from the stack to the actions, I’m
not sure this constraint really makes sense.