[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: C++ preferences (was: RFC: lalr1.cc: support move semantics)
From: |
Akim Demaille |
Subject: |
Re: C++ preferences (was: RFC: lalr1.cc: support move semantics) |
Date: |
Thu, 13 Sep 2018 19:00:53 +0200 |
> Le 13 sept. 2018 à 11:16, Hans Åberg <address@hidden> a écrit :
>
>
>> On 12 Sep 2018, at 23:45, Frank Heckenbach <address@hidden> wrote:
>>
>> But if there was a more concise syntax, I'd like it. I had
>> fantasized about a new keyword ("let") or a new syntax (":="), but
>> if "const" with implied "auto" can simply work, that would be great.
>> But we're not designing C++ here, I know ...
>
> There is Unicode ≔ U+2254 COLON EQUALS if one dares leaving the ASCII range,
> which in fact I am using in my own language, for definitions and Hoare logic
> code.
Nice idea, but too small a difference visually with the font I have right now.
For definitions, you also have ≝ and ≜.
- Re: C++ preferences, (continued)
- Re: C++ preferences (was: RFC: lalr1.cc: support move semantics), Frank Heckenbach, 2018/09/13
- Re: C++ preferences (was: RFC: lalr1.cc: support move semantics), Akim Demaille, 2018/09/15
- Re: C++ preferences (was: RFC: lalr1.cc: support move semantics), Frank Heckenbach, 2018/09/15
- Re: C++ preferences (was: RFC: lalr1.cc: support move semantics), Akim Demaille, 2018/09/15
- Re: C++ preferences (was: RFC: lalr1.cc: support move semantics), Frank Heckenbach, 2018/09/15
- Re: C++ preferences (was: RFC: lalr1.cc: support move semantics), Akim Demaille, 2018/09/16
- Re: C++ preferences (was: RFC: lalr1.cc: support move semantics), Hans Åberg, 2018/09/13
- Re: C++ preferences (was: RFC: lalr1.cc: support move semantics),
Akim Demaille <=
- Re: C++ preferences, Hans Åberg, 2018/09/13