[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: RFC: documentation for typed mid-rule actions
From: |
Hans Åberg |
Subject: |
Re: RFC: documentation for typed mid-rule actions |
Date: |
Sun, 12 Aug 2018 17:57:53 +0200 |
> On 12 Aug 2018, at 11:33, Akim Demaille <address@hidden> wrote:
>
> I would also like to enforce consistency in Bison which uses
> both midrule and mid-rule. I am in favor of ‘midrule'
> (shorter, consistent with our move to lookahead instead of
> look-ahead, more consistent between code and doc as there is
> no conversion from dash to underscore, etc.), but I am not
> a native! To which one should we stick? (FWIW, neither
> appear in the manual of YACC, only ‘An action appearing in the
> middle of a rule […]’ does).
Use midrule: all search hits seem to refer to Bison.