[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: <reductions>
From: |
Tim Van Holder |
Subject: |
Re: <reductions> |
Date: |
Wed, 10 Oct 2007 10:10:23 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (Windows/20070728) |
Joel E. Denny wrote:
>> For bison you could use "urn:x-gnu:bison:2.3b" or something.
>
> Is there a precedent for this? I guess x = xml?
The "x-" prefix stands for experimental; without it, the URN would be
'nonstandard' because the first word after the initial 'urn:' is the
namespace name and namespaces need to be officially registered for it
to be a 'real' URN. Exception is the experimental namespaces, which is
why I used one - I have no idea if there's more appropriate namespaces
already available.
Re: <reductions>, Joel E. Denny, 2007/10/14