Re: [updated PATCH] %language declaration

[Paolo Bonzini]

> > > The C++ skeletons and %destructor seemed to do okay this way, but I don't
> > > know the full history there.
> > Yes, but I also think that we should not exaggerate.
>
> Exaggerate what?  That they did okay?  Or the instability of our current 
> directives?

The instability.

> > If it wasn't for the language conventions, I would have kept the ".tab" even
> > in the Java output, as I don't like to depart too much from the traditional
> > Bison behavior.
>
> My feeling is that the community has already departed... look at Bison's 
> own parse-gram.c and parse-gram.h.

Yes, but the community is still relying on Bison appending ".tab": if 
Bison started removing ".tab" *on its own*, Automake would break.

Paolo