Re: %name-prefix overrides --name-prefix?

[Joel E. Denny]

On Thu, 14 Dec 2006, Hans Aberg wrote:

> Another idea that came to my mind, which I just mention, is to separate Bison
> language and compiler options. Language options should then go in the .y file,
> and the compiler options in some other file. But perhaps this is not the
> practise of other compilers.
> 
> But by this idea, language options should then not be alterable by startup
> arguments. In particular, %language should only not be duplicated by a
> --language. Perhaps this idea is what you sense intuitively.

I'm afraid I don't know what is considered a "language option" versus a 
"compiler option".  Also, separate input files sounds like a paradigm 
shift (and a lot of implementation work) that I don't think we're ready 
for.