Re: experimental features in Bison 2.3a+

[Hans Aberg]

On 4 Dec 2006, at 22:55, Joel E. Denny wrote:

> > Or so, was my idea with %code. I am not sure what the idea is to  
> > now add a
> > much more lmited variation of that command - evidently it is not  
> > in 2.3.a.
>
> Does this not satisfy your needs?
>
>   %define "NAME" { CODE }

Apart from the ugly, redundant quotes around the macro name, there  
might be problems in the future, if the code part should be parsed  
according to language. Then %define is better reserved for verbatim  
macros, and %code for code placement.

  Hans Aberg