Re: experimental features in Bison 2.3a+

[Paul Eggert]

"Joel E. Denny" <address@hidden> writes:

> It seems to me that the following features ought to be documented as 
> experimental since they have been somewhat controversial even among Bison 
> developers:
>
> 1. Default %destructor's and %printer's.  These are currently declared 
> with <*> and <>.
>
> 2. The prologue alternatives: %code, %requires, %provides, and %code-top.

Yes.  Though to be honest I can't even remember what all of them are
for....