Re: push parser implemenation

[Bob Rossi]

On Thu, Sep 14, 2006 at 06:02:54PM +0200, Akim Demaille wrote:
> I *think* that you are referring to the body of yyparse, but I'm
> talking about the name of the function only.  I am by no means
> referring to the code of the yyparse function, but merely the *name*.
> 
> When the push features are enabled, rename what used to be yyparse
> into something else (using m4), and provide a wrapper named yyparse
> that calls repeatedly the push interface.
> 
> Am I clear?

Yes! This is clear, and I like the idea. Do you like the name
yypushparse ()?

Now, one last issue I'd like to resolve before posting the newest patch.
How should I handle the %parse-param option in %push-parser mode? Should
the yyparse () function and the yypushparse () function both accept the
%parse-param arguments?

Thanks,
Bob Rossi