Re: bison ps f

[Joel E. Denny]

On Mon, 6 Mar 2006, Paul Eggert wrote:

> > also GLR is not mentioned on the homepage of Bison
> > and GLR nowadays is going every day better and better. 
> 
> That's a documentation fix, I guess.  Suggestions, anybody?

We're talking about this, right?

  http://www.gnu.org/software/bison/

The introduction in the documentation would need the same update.

A simple fix would be to replace:

  for an LALR context-free grammar into a C program

with:

  for an LALR(1) or GLR context-free grammar into a C or C++ program

Also, replace:

  You need to be fluent in C programming

with:

  You need to be fluent in C or C++ programming

Is this reasonable?  Can someone think of something better?

Joel