Re: no users destructors if stack 0 deleted (was: Re: duplicated user destructor for lookahead)

[Joel E. Denny]

On Tue, 4 Oct 2005, Joel E. Denny wrote:

> On Mon, 26 Sep 2005, Joel E. Denny wrote:
>
> > On Tue, 20 Sep 2005, Joel E. Denny wrote:
> >
> > > In the event of memory exhaustion, if stack 0 happens to be marked for 
> > > deletion (guaranteeing that in a test case is not something I want to 
> > > think about), no user destructors are called on any symbols.
> >
> > I created a test case.
>
> <snip>
>
> > I created a patch using this approach.
> >
> > I've only tested after applying my earlier `duplicated user destructor for 
> > lookahead' patch, which I cut from the diff for this patch.
>
> I just want to be sure the two patches and one test case mentioned above are 
> not forgotten.  You can find them here:
>
>  http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bison-patches/2005-09/msg00078.html
>  http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bison-patches/2005-09/msg00109.html

In case it should help expedite these patches, I've retested them with the 
most recent CVS sources for bison.  Except for the line numbers in the 
diffs, they should be fine.  All test cases pass.  Let me know if more 
current diffs would help.

Joel