[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: FYI: Silent make check -C examples
From: |
Akim Demaille |
Subject: |
Re: FYI: Silent make check -C examples |
Date: |
Fri, 14 Oct 2005 08:10:48 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.110004 (No Gnus v0.4) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) |
>>> "Paul" == Paul Eggert <address@hidden> writes:
>> I don't see the connection. Aren't you confused with set +x?
> Yes I was, sorry.
> I was confused because the ChangeLog entry talks only about being
> quiet, and yet the patch removed the "set +e". Shouldn't the removal
> of "set +e" have been logged as well?
Well, it was stray and should not have been there. I tend to drop
insignificant things from the ChangeLog.
> Or perhaps the "set +e" should have been kept? Presumably it was
> there for a reason.
I can see no good reason why I had put this set +e. Set -e is a fine
person, but +e is not :)
I have checked in the following.
Index: ChangeLog
from Akim Demaille <address@hidden>
* examples/calc++/test: Use set -x only when VERBOSE.
Index: examples/calc++/test
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvsroot/bison/bison/examples/calc++/test,v
retrieving revision 1.3
diff -u -u -r1.3 test
--- examples/calc++/test 10 Oct 2005 11:41:27 -0000 1.3
+++ examples/calc++/test 14 Oct 2005 06:10:36 -0000
@@ -2,6 +2,7 @@
test -z "$VERBOSE" && {
exec > /dev/null 2>&1
+ set -x
}
cat >input <<EOF
@@ -21,8 +22,6 @@
EOF
./calc++ input
-set -x
-echo toto
cat >input <<EOF
toto := 1
toto