[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Bison patch for POSIX and Yacc compatibility with %union
|
From: |
Akim Demaille |
|
Subject: |
Re: Bison patch for POSIX and Yacc compatibility with %union |
|
Date: |
Mon, 13 Jan 2003 18:53:47 +0100 |
|
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.090008 (Oort Gnus v0.08) Emacs/21.2 (i386-pc-linux-gnu) |
Paul> I installed the following patch to fix the "%union foo { ... }"
Paul> compatibility issue noted by David Durham and others. While I
Paul> was at it, I noticed that Bison does not conform to POSIX with
Paul> respect to the YYSTYPE typedef. The following patch fixes both
Paul> issues.
Hi Paul,
I find this patch to be quite hard to understand. Why did you chose
to allow the identifier at the scanner level? Why not having accepted
this extension in the grammar instead?
- Re: Bison patch for POSIX and Yacc compatibility with %union,
Akim Demaille <=
- Re: Bison patch for POSIX and Yacc compatibility with %union, Paul Eggert, 2003/01/13
- Re: POSIX_ME_HARDER (Was: Bison patch for POSIX and Yacc compatibility with %union), Akim Demaille, 2003/01/15
- Re: POSIX_ME_HARDER (Was: Bison patch for POSIX and Yacc compatibility with %union), Paul Eggert, 2003/01/16
- Re: %union foo bar baz and others { ... }, Akim Demaille, 2003/01/19
- Re: %union foo bar baz and others { ... }, Paul Eggert, 2003/01/20
- Re: %union foo bar baz and others { ... }, Akim Demaille, 2003/01/21
- Re: %union foo bar baz and others { ... }, Paul Eggert, 2003/01/22
- Re: %union foo bar baz and others { ... }, Akim Demaille, 2003/01/22
- Re: %union foo bar baz and others { ... }, Paul Eggert, 2003/01/22
- Re: ending ; (Was: POSIX_ME_HARDER), Akim Demaille, 2003/01/21