Re: TODO update

[Paul Hilfinger]

+**  GLR
+How would Paul like to display the conflicted actions?  In particular,
+what when two reductions are possible on a given lookahead, but one is
+part of $default.  Should we make the two reductions explicit, or just
+keep $default?  See the following point.
 
Perhaps I don't understand this issue properly.  In GLR mode (well,
unless you've changed something), no conflicted action is ever
supposed to be $defaulted (Why? Well, it can't be: entries in which
the default action applies are allocated no space in the relevant
tables, but GLR needs space in the tables in order to record the
conflicts).  This is (supposed to be) the only way that tables common
to GLR parsers and ordinary LALR parsers differ.

Paul