[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [tim-6] MAXTABLE and suffix comment
From: |
Akim Demaille |
Subject: |
Re: [tim-6] MAXTABLE and suffix comment |
Date: |
07 Jan 2002 11:28:58 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.0808 (Gnus v5.8.8) XEmacs/21.4 (Common Lisp) |
>>>>> "Tim" == Tim Van Holder <address@hidden> writes:
>> Just give me some time.
Tim> No problem at all - the whole point of submitting patches is a)
Tim> to have them reviewed (no matter how long that review process
Tim> might be), and b) to have some sort of record of what things were
Tim> submitted (as opposed to having to dig through bug reports).
Good :)
Tim> Does this review period also apply to the DOS extension choice
Tim> (always use y_tab <-> only use it if y.tab can't be used), or do
Tim> you have an opinion on that?
The only opinion I have here is that we inherited that from the past.
If we can get rid of it, then *perfect*: I'm all for it.
As a matter of fact, I plan to remove soon all the VMS stuff: it's
been dead for years now.
Tim> This looks like something that can't be cleanly separated out,
Tim> although it is system-specific.
Agreed.