[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Fw: Kill warnings
From: |
Akim Demaille |
Subject: |
Re: Fw: Kill warnings |
Date: |
30 Nov 2001 16:09:52 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.0808 (Gnus v5.8.8) XEmacs/21.4 (Civil Service) |
>>>>> "Pascal" == Pascal Bart <address@hidden> writes:
Pascal> Hi Akim,
>> There have been so many complaints about compilers that seem to be
>> much more picky than GCC, or more exactly, than my ability to check
>> GCC doesn't complain at all, that using -Werror seems the best
>> solutions to me.
Pascal> Well, I don't really understand you interest for -Werror,
Pascal> IMHO this is not a good idea to use it, a lot of warnings
Pascal> comes from external source code, and any warnings are
Pascal> debatables.
Right, but what's it got to do with it? I'm referring to compiling
Bison and the test suite.
Pascal> And I cann't remember complains from users, about any
Pascal> unsolvable errors.
Maybe your memory is too short: you were in the set of people
complaining about signed < unsigned :) :) :)
I agree it is debatable. What is not, is our peace, is our not having
to answer reports about warnings in the code produced by Bison.