bibledit-development
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[be] [task #9764] cannot move reference list scroll bar when using find/


From: Teus Benschop
Subject: [be] [task #9764] cannot move reference list scroll bar when using find/replace
Date: Sat, 03 Oct 2009 16:29:51 +0000
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.0.14) Gecko/2009090216 Ubuntu/9.04 (jaunty) Firefox/3.0.14

URL:
  <http://savannah.nongnu.org/task/?9764>

                 Summary: cannot move reference list scroll bar when using
find/replace
                 Project: Bibledit
            Submitted by: oreo
            Submitted on: Sat 03 Oct 2009 06:29:50 PM CAT
                  Status: None
             Assigned to: None
             Open/Closed: Open
         Discussion Lock: Any

    _______________________________________________________

Details:

When Using Find/Replace, if the reference list starts out not at the top, it
will remain not at the top when a Find/Replace is done. One cannot see the
number of instances of the find string that have been found.

When doing a Find/Replace, I want to know how many have been found. So it
would be helpful that the find/replace routine also move the scroll bar of the
Reference window to the top, 
OR that the scroll bar be unfrozen so that the user can examine the
references. 
Or both.

    _______________________________________________________

Follow-up Comments:


-------------------------------------------------------
Date: Thu 21 Jul 2005 06:35:54 PM CATBy: spiralvoice <spiralvoice>
This patch report is old. If the bug still exists in current
versions please post a new bug report - spiralvoice

-------------------------------------------------------
Date: Thu 19 May 2005 02:49:22 AM CATBy: spiralvoice <spiralvoice>
Please check if this bug still is in current CVS version.
You should find a tarball of current CVS in files section of
this project: http://download.berlios.de/pub/mldonkey/spiralvoice/

-------------------------------------------------------
Date: Sat 21 Aug 2004 11:17:16 PM CATBy: Anonymous
Since those IPs come from what should be a Direct_address list, it shows how
much crap is being kept...
IMHO a best fix would be to prevent them from being added to sources lists in
the first place...


-------------------------------------------------------
Date: Wed 11 Aug 2004 12:52:59 PM CATBy: Anonymous
well, regarding parsing the packets, I rely on ethereal (and my little
knowledge about edonkey protocol). 
but I can see the values in the hexpacket, so I am sure, they are shown
right. The packets have been captured with tcpdump (snapsize 1024 byte), so
think I also can rely on that..

I checked back.
I am downloading a file, with 19 chunks (said by files.ini), 2 found sources
(said by file_sources), and got this attached packet on wire.

there are 40 IP's in that packet.

some 0.0.0.0 IP's have a port assigned
some IP's in there are without a port
some IP's are just illegal (Network-addr, start with 0.0, etc. p.p.)

I have force_high_id enabled .. I have a direct connection to the net ..
shouldn't the whole packet then be 0.0.0.0 ?




-------------------------------------------------------
Date: Mon 09 Aug 2004 07:47:23 PM CATBy: mldonkey admin <mldonkey>
Are you sure of your method to parse the packets ? Message 0x82 in
sourceexchange > 1 is supposed to contain, for each source, its IP address and
port, the IP address and port of the server (or zeros if HIGH-ID), and the UID
of the source (which is not known by mldonkey since it doesn't keep this
information, thus sending a lot of zeroes again).


-------------------------------------------------------
Date: Mon 26 Jul 2004 03:08:19 PM CATBy: Anonymous
its even worse than i thought.
bash-2.05b$ grep IP /tmp/networkbug | sort | uniq -c
     28         IP: 0.0.0.0 (0.0.0.0)
      1         IP: 0.0.217.157 (0.0.217.157)
      1         IP: 0.0.217.235 (0.0.217.235)
      1         IP: 0.0.82.80 (0.0.82.80)
      1         IP: 146.16.0.0 (146.16.0.0)
      1         IP: 210.192.25.82 (210.192.25.82)
      1         IP: 217.234.39.184 (217.234.39.184)
      1         IP: 24.196.54.18 (24.196.54.18)
      1         IP: 4.92.54.18 (4.92.54.18)
      2         IP: 54.18.0.0 (54.18.0.0)
      1         IP: 62.147.213.190 (62.147.213.190)
      1         IP: 68.157.54.18 (68.157.54.18)

28 IP's with 0.0.0.0 (nonsense)
3 IP's with 0.0.x.x (nonsense)
2 IP's with x.x.0.0 (class B network address = nonsense)

makes 33 from 40 IP's which are nonsense.

Suggested QuickFix: just send every addr/port-pair once.








    _______________________________________________________

File Attachments:


-------------------------------------------------------
Date: Wed 11 Aug 2004 12:52:59 PM CAT  Name: details  Size: 8kB   By: None
ethereal packet log
<http://savannah.nongnu.org/bugs/download.php?file_id=1642>

    _______________________________________________________

Reply to this item at:

  <http://savannah.nongnu.org/task/?9764>

_______________________________________________
  Message sent via/by Savannah
  http://savannah.nongnu.org/





reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]