bibledit-development
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[be] [task #7965] support for verse-by-verse style


From: Teus Benschop
Subject: [be] [task #7965] support for verse-by-verse style
Date: Wed, 14 May 2008 16:57:13 +0000
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.8.1.14) Gecko/20080404 Firefox/2.0.0.14

Update of task #7965 (project bibledit):

                  Status:          Ready For Test => None                   
             Open/Closed:                  Closed => Open                   

    _______________________________________________________

Follow-up Comment #4:

My opinion is that BE needs the ability to see verse style, not just in
printouts but on the screen. And users need to see the usfm in a way that is
better than the pop-up usfm screen. I would suggest that this be done in a way
similar to Paratext, where a Ctrl-key can be pressed to change the view. Each
key press would toggle between Formatted View, Verse View, USFM with long
lines wrapped, and USFM without wrapping.

What I am proposing is that there would be three view-style sheets in the
same way that one can have different style sheets for printing. The differing
views would not need to change the usfm structure, and it might be that in
certain views certain usfm markers would be protected from change.

So currently, a p causes an indent in formatted view. In verse-style view, it
would cause a blank line. In verse-style view v would mean that verse numbers
would start a new line. etc.

In the first usfm view, the view of the plain text would be just like you
would see it in a text editor. That is, one would see all the markers, but the
long lines would wrap so that the user could see all of the text. Currently in
the pop-up viewer, the lines are not wrapped, so finding an end-footnote
marker is very inconvenient. It would be nice in usfm view if different usfm
markers appeared in different colors, like how some programmer's text editors
work with programming symbols.

Thanks,
Phil

    _______________________________________________________

Reply to this item at:

  <http://savannah.nongnu.org/task/?7965>

_______________________________________________
  Message sent via/by Savannah
  http://savannah.nongnu.org/





reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]