[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[BHL] BHL 1.4.5
From: |
Bastien Guerry |
Subject: |
[BHL] BHL 1.4.5 |
Date: |
24 Feb 2003 18:14:53 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.2 |
Hello,
this is a major bug fixes release and minor feature enhancement.
http://www.nongnu.org/bhl
,----[ News ]
| Fixed table headers conversion -- thx to D. Katz.
| Fixed font beautifiers regexp (escape at the end).
| Get rid of the mode-line.
| Get rid of skeleton (-> XEmacs)
| Modified bhl-change-font.
| Added bhl-change-font-normal.
| Simplified the handling of plist and the parsing of
| specifications: fixed a BIG BAD BUG that prevented
| the customization of bhl2xxx.
`----
I need your advice. The use of asterisks in order to indicate a
header cell in a table is not very convenient. I've first chosen
asterisks because I thought we'd like headers to appear in bold font.
But the header-meaning and font-meaning can conflict together. In
fact, if you want to put a header like
,----
| *2 \* 2 = 4*
`----
the font-meaning will be ignored.
So I suggest to use a distinct character that would indicate headers.
This character would have a syntactic meaning *only* in cells of a
table. I think `@' is the right one.
,----
| @ a beautiful header @
| @ *a bold header* @
| @2 \* 2 = 4@
| @ address@hidden
`----
will be OK.
Tell me if you think that there is some danger to use the @ character
in this context -- or if you already have the habits to use asterisks.
Thank you,
-- Bastien
[Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread] |
- [BHL] BHL 1.4.5,
Bastien Guerry <=