[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Beaver-devel] Fw: Re: some software and fluxbox questions
From: |
Leslie Polzer |
Subject: |
[Beaver-devel] Fw: Re: some software and fluxbox questions |
Date: |
Sat, 14 Jun 2003 14:09:00 +0200 |
Hello Michael, hello list,
please take a look at the forwarded mail.
I think he/she has got a point - we should do something
about it.
Perhaps the most important points are that Beaver keeps
its dependencies at a minimum, is centered at X Window
(unlike gvim which is just some extension), is intuitive
(to this point I still haven't figured out Vim's advanced
features [without GUI]!) and not resource-intensive.
Further suggestions (and phrasings) here...
Best regards,
Leslie
Begin forwarded message:
Date: Sat, 14 Jun 2003 09:10:31 +0000 (UTC)
From: Csaba Henk <address@hidden>
To: address@hidden
Subject: Re: some software and fluxbox questions
In article <address@hidden>, Leslie Polzer wrote:
>
><shameless self-advert>
> Beaver CVS - http://www.nongnu.org/beaver
></shameless self-advert>
Well, you made me interested, and I checked out the Beaver homepage. Guy,
you really need a mission statement or features page or thing like that! I
couldn't figure out any advantage of this editor, based on the info on the
Beaver page. Yep, I see it looks fancy, but you don't tell the visitor why
souldn't s/he stick at Vim, eg. Even the changelog -- a substitute for a
features page at some extent -- is not there to view directly, it's just in
the tarball. I won't download a tarball just to figure out what this thing I
downloaded is.
Csaba
--
Unsubscribe: send email to address@hidden
and put 'unsubscribe lfs-chat' in the subject header of the message
--
Current Main System: LFS Linux dreadnought 2.4.20 #18 Thu May 15 19:11:10 CEST
2003 i686
Random Religious Statement: GNOME at least sucks less than KDE!
[Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread] |
- [Beaver-devel] Fw: Re: some software and fluxbox questions,
Leslie Polzer <=