axiom-math
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Axiom-math] Re: [open-axiom-devel] [fricas-devel] generators, was: Re:


From: Martin Rubey
Subject: [Axiom-math] Re: [open-axiom-devel] [fricas-devel] generators, was: Re: iterators and cartesian product.
Date: 24 Oct 2007 15:41:46 +0200
User-agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.4

Gabriel Dos Reis <address@hidden> writes:

> | Yes.  But I have the impression that so far the compiler gurus did not
> | write much mathematical code in Aldor or SPAD.
> 
> Thanks for the credit.

Since this seems to imply that I'm mistaken, I apologize.  So far, I thought
you contributed a lot to the build system, to analyzing the compiler and the
language. These are all things I could not possibly do, I do not have the
expertise.  I didn't see much algebra code by Waldek, either.  (I am not
speaking of fixing bugs, he fixed many many many.  I was only speaking of the
design of new packages / domains / etc.)  Still, you probably know that I value
Waldek as one of the most important axiom contributors.  And I'm pretty sure
that, once time is ripe, Waldek or his students will provide important
contributions, it suffices to look at his "literature" webpage.  Same goes for
you.

I did certainly not want to insult anybody.  If I did, I apologize.  I tried to
reply to

> | The only thing I can do is to advertise the language design of Aldor...
> 
> I suspect that the compiler gurus already know Aldor's design choices.  It
> may be that they don't want to replicate, or they would like to make slighly
> different choices...

as well as I could, and obviously, I failed miserably.

Just curious, could you please refresh my memory?

Martin







reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]