[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [avrdude-dev] Load Extended Address command and word/byte programmin
From: |
Joerg Wunsch |
Subject: |
Re: [avrdude-dev] Load Extended Address command and word/byte programming issues |
Date: |
Tue, 20 Mar 2012 16:49:24 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) |
As Hannes Weisbach wrote:
> 1) Does avrdude take care of issuing a load extended address
> command? Because page programming is now done page-by-page avrdude
> "knows" when the 128k boundary is crossed and could issue a load
> extended address command. is this the case?
Depends on the programmer in use. If you look into the code for
STK500v2, you'll find things like:
/*
* If bit 31 is set, this indicates that the following read/write
* operation will be performed on a memory that is larger than
* 64KBytes. This is an indication to STK500 that a load extended
* address must be executed.
*/
if (m->op[AVR_OP_LOAD_EXT_ADDR] != NULL) {
use_ext_addr = (1U << 31);
}
...
if((last_addr==UINT_MAX)||(last_addr+block_size != addr)){
if (stk500v2_loadaddr(pgm, use_ext_addr | (addr >> addrshift)) < 0)
return -1;
}
Other programmers, like the JTAGICEmkII, simply get a 32-bit address
passed along, and handle all that stuff internally.
> 2) If the programmer has to issue the load extended address command:
> Does the command need to be issued _exactly_ once, or can it be
> issued multiple times?
I don't think sending it more than once would harm, except being a
speed pessimization.
> 3) It seems to me, today all AVRs are programmed word-by-word, and a
> word being 2 bytes wide. Is this correct?
The flash memory area(s) is (are) programmed in terms of 16-bit units,
but all other memory areas use 8-bit units.
--
cheers, J"org .-.-. --... ...-- -.. . DL8DTL
http://www.sax.de/~joerg/ NIC: JW11-RIPE
Never trust an operating system you don't have sources for. ;-)