[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [avrdude-dev] [bug #30559] Ft232 bit-bang support
From: |
Jan Waclawek |
Subject: |
Re: [avrdude-dev] [bug #30559] Ft232 bit-bang support |
Date: |
Mon, 16 Jan 2012 23:49:15 +0100 |
Newer AVRs do have paged EEPROM, programmed in a similar style as FLASH (except
for the high/low byte load mechanism for FLASH). See for example ATMega88's
datasheet.
Jan Waclawek
PS. Sorry for responding off thread
--- Original message ---
Both ft245r.c and serjtag.c have "generic" paged_write functions that are used
for eeprom writing. I think I saw some coding errors in that part and wondered
how it could have passed my testing I claimed I had done below. The answer is
that those are called (in my testing) with m->paged set to false, so that code
was never executed. The question is: Can non-flash memory in AVRs be paged?
- [avrdude-dev] [bug #30559] Ft232 bit-bang support, (continued)
- [avrdude-dev] [bug #30559] Ft232 bit-bang support, Rene Liebscher, 2012/01/12
- [avrdude-dev] [bug #30559] Ft232 bit-bang support, Roger Wolff, 2012/01/12
- [avrdude-dev] [bug #30559] Ft232 bit-bang support, Rene Liebscher, 2012/01/13
- [avrdude-dev] [bug #30559] Ft232 bit-bang support, Roger Wolff, 2012/01/16
- [avrdude-dev] [bug #30559] Ft232 bit-bang support, Rene Liebscher, 2012/01/16
- Re: [avrdude-dev] [bug #30559] Ft232 bit-bang support, David Harris, 2012/01/17
- Re: [avrdude-dev] [bug #30559] Ft232 bit-bang support, René Liebscher, 2012/01/17
- Re: [avrdude-dev] [bug #30559] Ft232 bit-bang support, René Liebscher, 2012/01/17
- Re: [avrdude-dev] [bug #30559] Ft232 bit-bang support, Rogier Wolff, 2012/01/17
- [avrdude-dev] [bug #30559] Ft232 bit-bang support, Roger Wolff, 2012/01/20
Re: [avrdude-dev] [bug #30559] Ft232 bit-bang support,
Jan Waclawek <=