[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [avrdude-dev] patch #5655, again
From: |
Windell H. Oskay |
Subject: |
Re: [avrdude-dev] patch #5655, again |
Date: |
Tue, 23 Mar 2010 22:54:27 -0700 |
On Mar 23, 2010, at 10:18 PM, Joerg Wunsch wrote:
> Yes, the patch is rather a hack, see my comment which nobody
> bothered to reply to within those 2.5 years:
>
> "I'd really like to see some more analysis for the actual cause
> of this problem before adding a hack that simply disables the
> sign-on command."
Yes, I saw that. Please consider this thread a reply. ;)
> So this would require someone with a Mac willing to actually *do*
> some analysis first.
If you can tell me what to test, I'll do my best.
> Can you get me a communication trace
> (-vvvv) for both (patched/unpatched) cases?
Yes; I'll send them to you off-list (unless anyone wants to see them here).
> Btw., the patch no longer applies at all, due to other structural
> changes. Did it apply for you?
No, I patched it manually.
After:
if (PDATA(pgm)->pgmtype == PGMTYPE_JTAGICE_MKII)
return 0;
Added:
if (PDATA(pgm)->pgmtype == PGMTYPE_AVRISP_MKII)
return 0;
- [avrdude-dev] patch #5655, again, Windell H. Oskay, 2010/03/24
- Re: [avrdude-dev] patch #5655, again, Joerg Wunsch, 2010/03/24
- Re: [avrdude-dev] patch #5655, again,
Windell H. Oskay <=
- Re: [avrdude-dev] patch #5655, again, Jason von Nieda, 2010/03/24
- Re: [avrdude-dev] patch #5655, again, Joerg Wunsch, 2010/03/24
- Re: [avrdude-dev] patch #5655, again, Windell H. Oskay, 2010/03/24
- Re: [avrdude-dev] patch #5655, again, Jason von Nieda, 2010/03/24