[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [avrdude-dev] avrdude on Windows
From: |
E. Weddington |
Subject: |
Re: [avrdude-dev] avrdude on Windows |
Date: |
Thu, 13 Feb 2003 14:23:41 -0700 |
On 13 Feb 2003 at 21:29, Joerg Wunsch wrote:
> As E. Weddington wrote:
>
> > > Per definitionem, that's the same.
>
> > I know. I just prefer *explicit* definitions as I was planning on
> > using the values as offsets.
>
> You still can, even without the explicit definitions, as long as
> your C implementation adhers to the standard. :)
Know that too. I just have a preference for explicit definitions.
There's always the possibility that you get somebody who doesn't know
they have implicit values and tries to monkey around with them.
Eric
- Re: [avrdude-dev] avrdude on Windows, (continued)
- Re: [avrdude-dev] avrdude on Windows, Brian Dean, 2003/02/13
- Re: [avrdude-dev] avrdude on Windows, E. Weddington, 2003/02/13
- Re: [avrdude-dev] avrdude on Windows, Brian Dean, 2003/02/13
- Re: [avrdude-dev] avrdude on Windows, Joerg Wunsch, 2003/02/13
- Re: [avrdude-dev] avrdude on Windows, E. Weddington, 2003/02/13
- Re: [avrdude-dev] avrdude on Windows, Joerg Wunsch, 2003/02/13
- Re: [avrdude-dev] avrdude on Windows,
E. Weddington <=
- Re: [avrdude-dev] avrdude on Windows, Brian Dean, 2003/02/13
- Re: [avrdude-dev] avrdude on Windows, Theodore A. Roth, 2003/02/13