[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [avr-libc-dev] [avr-libc-commit] [2348] Modified system_tick as advi
From: |
Bob Paddock |
Subject: |
Re: [avr-libc-dev] [avr-libc-commit] [2348] Modified system_tick as advised by Wouter van Gulik... |
Date: |
Wed, 17 Apr 2013 08:26:42 -0400 |
On Tue, Apr 16, 2013 at 7:42 PM, Mike Rice <address@hidden> wrote:
> Revision: 2348
> http://svn.sv.gnu.org/viewvc/?view=rev&root=avr-libc&revision=2348
> Author: swfltek
> Date: 2013-04-16 23:42:05 +0000 (Tue, 16 Apr 2013)
> Log Message:
...
> /*
> - This function increments __system time by one second. It is safe to
> call from a 'naked' ISR.
> + Impoved system_tick Credit to Wouter van Gulik.
> */
....
> + ret
Is there an issue with this code when run on a XMega that requires
ISR's to end with RETI?
Need a XMega and non-XMega version of this function? Doesn't sound good.
Normal prolog/epilog deal with that I believe but this is intended to
be 'naked'.
How do you get automatic RET vs RETI?
[Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread] |
- Re: [avr-libc-dev] [avr-libc-commit] [2348] Modified system_tick as advised by Wouter van Gulik...,
Bob Paddock <=