|
From: | Erik Walthinsen |
Subject: | Re: [avr-libc-dev] 1.8.1? |
Date: | Fri, 30 Nov 2012 14:40:13 -0800 |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:16.0) Gecko/20121011 Thunderbird/16.0.1 |
On 11/30/2012 11:04 AM, Weddington, Eric wrote:
I thought I read a while back that since the headers are strictly derived (by scripts, the part I haven't worked out yet) from the Atmel-owned XML that there were some ownership issues. Since my solution here to make things built was to literally straight-copy the headers from the ASF install on my Windows VM, it's even more dodgy in that sense.The header files go into avr-libc, which just has the BSD license. All we require of submitters, is that they license their work with the same license (for consistency purposes). You would retain the copyright.
I've got things working now, just need to get it into a sane set of patches, and I guess when it comes to those files if Atmel doesn't care, neither do I ;-)
I'd class these as trivial patches (they're done in a for() loop...) but they're more than 10 lines. I can do the copyright assignment, or I can just email you my script and let you take "ownership" of the binutils and gcc changes if that's more expedient.Code going into binutils and gcc is a different matter as the FSF (owner of those projects) require a copyright assignment for any non-trivial work (defined as greater than 10 lines of code).
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |