Re: [avr-libc-dev] 1.8.1?

[Erik Walthinsen]

On 11/30/2012 08:49 AM, Weddington, Eric wrote:
> Cool! Do you have any public links to your talk?

<https://media.defcon.org/dc-20/presentations/Anch-Omega/FDEFCON-20-Anch-Omega-The-Darknet-of-Things.pdf>

<http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pMY80H9PUus>

> I know that ARM GCC has a similar switch. IIRC, it only selects the core.
Right, which leaves the linker script, crt, headers, etc. up to the 
project developer ;-(

> FYI, there's an open source project that adds the AVR backend to LLVM. It's 
> currently on SourceForge (name: avr-llvm).
Yeah, I have no idea how functional it is though...

> Guys, the main point of this thread is to get avr-libc 1.8.1 out the door. I'll 
> I was asking for was help with the avr-libc bug list.
Sorry, this is just a *really* sore point with me in both AVR and ARM. 
I agree that getting 1.8.1 done is the immediate priority, which is why 
I'm cranking on the full-range Xmega patches right now.  Hopefully the 
binutils and gcc components can be pushed up ASAP as well.

> I understand the desire to reorganize the world to make it sane. I'd like that, 
> too. Yes, it's a big task. If anyone is really serious about doing that, then 
> let's put a plan together that can actually be worked on. Maybe that would be a 
> good reason to move avr-libc to 2.0.
I hopefully will have a little bit more leeway to work on something like 
that in the near future, so while I can't at this point take the lead 
either time- or skill-wise, I would love to be involved.