[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [avr-libc-dev] 1.8.1?
From: |
Weddington, Eric |
Subject: |
Re: [avr-libc-dev] 1.8.1? |
Date: |
Fri, 16 Nov 2012 18:04:00 +0000 |
> -----Original Message-----
> From: address@hidden
> [mailto:address@hidden On
> Behalf Of Joerg Wunsch
> Sent: Friday, November 16, 2012 9:59 AM
> To: address@hidden
> Subject: Re: [avr-libc-dev] 1.8.1?
>
> I agree that we should at least have a glance at the bugs and
> patches before rolling a new release.
Yes, it seems to have been accumulating...
BTW, do we have an up-to-date list of tool prerequisites to properly build
avr-libc and documentation? It seems I'm failing to build the documentation
properly (fails building refman.pdf in doc/api/latex_src).
- [avr-libc-dev] 1.8.1?, Weddington, Eric, 2012/11/15
- Re: [avr-libc-dev] 1.8.1?, Georg-Johann Lay, 2012/11/16
- Re: [avr-libc-dev] 1.8.1?, Joerg Wunsch, 2012/11/16
- Re: [avr-libc-dev] 1.8.1?,
Weddington, Eric <=
- Re: [avr-libc-dev] 1.8.1?, Weddington, Eric, 2012/11/16
- Re: [avr-libc-dev] 1.8.1?, Erik Walthinsen, 2012/11/29
- Re: [avr-libc-dev] 1.8.1?, Weddington, Eric, 2012/11/29
- Re: [avr-libc-dev] 1.8.1?, Joerg Wunsch, 2012/11/29
- Re: [avr-libc-dev] 1.8.1?, Erik Walthinsen, 2012/11/29
- Re: [avr-libc-dev] 1.8.1?, Weddington, Eric, 2012/11/29
- Re: [avr-libc-dev] 1.8.1?, Erik Walthinsen, 2012/11/30
- Re: [avr-libc-dev] 1.8.1?, Weddington, Eric, 2012/11/30
- Re: [avr-libc-dev] 1.8.1?, Erik Walthinsen, 2012/11/30
- Re: [avr-libc-dev] 1.8.1?, Weddington, Eric, 2012/11/30