[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [avr-libc-dev] 1.8.1?
From: |
Georg-Johann Lay |
Subject: |
Re: [avr-libc-dev] 1.8.1? |
Date: |
Fri, 16 Nov 2012 12:39:37 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Thunderbird 2.0.0.24 (X11/20100302) |
Weddington, Eric wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> It seems like it's been forever since we've had a discussion...
>
> Do you think we have enough changes in the repo to warrant a 1.8.1 release?
#35407 Missing multilib versions for tiny-stack targets
is a new feature and needed by people that roll distributions. If someone uses
1.8.0 together with avr-gcc 4.7 (or newer) he will get a non-functional library
for the 8-bit SP targets.
Johann
> Or should we get some bugs fixed and devices supported (yes, I know that
> last one is a discussion) before such a release?
>
> Thanks, Eric Weddington
- [avr-libc-dev] 1.8.1?, Weddington, Eric, 2012/11/15
- Re: [avr-libc-dev] 1.8.1?,
Georg-Johann Lay <=
- Re: [avr-libc-dev] 1.8.1?, Joerg Wunsch, 2012/11/16
- Re: [avr-libc-dev] 1.8.1?, Weddington, Eric, 2012/11/16
- Re: [avr-libc-dev] 1.8.1?, Weddington, Eric, 2012/11/16
- Re: [avr-libc-dev] 1.8.1?, Erik Walthinsen, 2012/11/29
- Re: [avr-libc-dev] 1.8.1?, Weddington, Eric, 2012/11/29
- Re: [avr-libc-dev] 1.8.1?, Joerg Wunsch, 2012/11/29
- Re: [avr-libc-dev] 1.8.1?, Erik Walthinsen, 2012/11/29
- Re: [avr-libc-dev] 1.8.1?, Weddington, Eric, 2012/11/29
- Re: [avr-libc-dev] 1.8.1?, Erik Walthinsen, 2012/11/30
- Re: [avr-libc-dev] 1.8.1?, Weddington, Eric, 2012/11/30