[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [avr-libc-dev] avr/iousbxx6_7.h: INT0_vect versus SIG_INTERRUPT0
|
From: |
Joerg Wunsch |
|
Subject: |
Re: [avr-libc-dev] avr/iousbxx6_7.h: INT0_vect versus SIG_INTERRUPT0 |
|
Date: |
Fri, 7 Sep 2012 15:36:47 +0200 |
|
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) |
As Uwe Bonnes wrote:
> Should I provide a patch against avr-libc-1.8.0 or are the name differences
> SIG_SPM_READY vs SPM_READY_vect and ANA_COMP_vect vs ANALOG_COMP_vect
> intentional.
Yes, they are (unfortunately) intentional: the policy is to match the
datasheet, rather than inventing our own names (as we previously did
with the SIG_* names).
Thus, if the ATmega16 datasheet names that vector "SPM_RDY" (and, by
policy, the ATmega16A datahseet did not change this), but the
AT90CAN128 datasheet names it "SPM_READY", we follow that (by simply
appending "_vect").
--
cheers, J"org .-.-. --... ...-- -.. . DL8DTL
http://www.sax.de/~joerg/ NIC: JW11-RIPE
Never trust an operating system you don't have sources for. ;-)