[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [avr-libc-dev] avr/iousbxx6_7.h: INT0_vect versus SIG_INTERRUPT0

From: Joerg Wunsch
Subject: Re: [avr-libc-dev] avr/iousbxx6_7.h: INT0_vect versus SIG_INTERRUPT0
Date: Fri, 7 Sep 2012 11:27:52 +0200
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14)

As Uwe Bonnes wrote:

> Is this intentional?

Yes, it is.

> Or would a patch defining all those SIG_XXXY be
> accepted?

By no means. ;-)

The old term "signal" and the respective interrupt vector naming
has been deprecated 7 years ago.  The old SIG_* vector names are
only kept for compatibility reasons in those header files where
they did already exist by that time.  All newer header files only
get *_vect style names.

Ethernut should finally catch up.
cheers, J"org               .-.-.   --... ...--   -.. .  DL8DTL

http://www.sax.de/~joerg/                        NIC: JW11-RIPE
Never trust an operating system you don't have sources for. ;-)

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]