[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [avr-libc-dev] avr/iousbxx6_7.h: INT0_vect versus SIG_INTERRUPT0
|
From: |
Joerg Wunsch |
|
Subject: |
Re: [avr-libc-dev] avr/iousbxx6_7.h: INT0_vect versus SIG_INTERRUPT0 |
|
Date: |
Fri, 7 Sep 2012 11:27:52 +0200 |
|
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) |
As Uwe Bonnes wrote:
> Is this intentional?
Yes, it is.
> Or would a patch defining all those SIG_XXXY be
> accepted?
By no means. ;-)
The old term "signal" and the respective interrupt vector naming
has been deprecated 7 years ago. The old SIG_* vector names are
only kept for compatibility reasons in those header files where
they did already exist by that time. All newer header files only
get *_vect style names.
Ethernut should finally catch up.
--
cheers, J"org .-.-. --... ...-- -.. . DL8DTL
http://www.sax.de/~joerg/ NIC: JW11-RIPE
Never trust an operating system you don't have sources for. ;-)