avr-libc-dev
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [avr-libc-dev] [bug #35467] Not sure this the right plce to submit t

From: David Brown
Subject: Re: [avr-libc-dev] [bug #35467] Not sure this the right plce to submit this but...
Date: Thu, 09 Feb 2012 09:16:17 +0100
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:10.0) Gecko/20120129 Thunderbird/10.0 
On 08/02/2012 20:17, Vidya Praveen wrote:

Hi

Things change in the compiler and there are often cases which are not
covered due to several reasons. it's not uncommon to see something that
works in a earlier version stops working later. It will be great if you
could reduce your test case and/or find out what is going wrong and post
this in avr-gcc-list.If you think the problem is specific to AVR
Toolchain, I recommend you to contact the Atmel support. Thanks
You are probably better off posting such information to the avr-gcc mailing list rather than Atmel support. I have nothing to complain about regarding Atmel's support team - I have certainly encountered far worse - but by posting to the avr-gcc mailing list you get the information directly to the people responsible for the avr port of gcc, and you also inform other avr-gcc users. 

mvh.,

David



Regards
Vidya Praveen



On Wed, Feb 8, 2012 at 9:42 PM, Daved <address@hidden
<mailto:address@hidden>> wrote:

    Thanks for the responses guys. It's not always clear where to post
    problems with this stuff.

    I have since done a general web search for the problem and did find
    a code correction for w5100.h. I was about to try it when my Arduino
    ATmega328P chip went bad and I am now waiting for another one in the
    mail. It's still puzzling why an earlier complier version works
    while a newer one does not.

    Anyway, I have already spent way too much time tracking this down so
    other than testing the code correction when I get a new chip, I am
    going to let it rest

    Dave

    ----- Original Message ----- From: "Joerg Wunsch"
    <address@hidden <mailto:address@hidden>>
    To: "David Brown" <address@hidden <mailto:address@hidden>>
    Cc: "David DeHaven" <address@hidden
    <mailto:address@hidden>>; <address@hidden
    <mailto:address@hidden>>
    Sent: Wednesday, February 08, 2012 5:46 AM
    Subject: Re: [avr-libc-dev] [bug #35467] Not sure this the right
    plce to submit this but...



        As David Brown wrote:

            For future reference, remember that when you make a bug
            report, the
            "summary" is critical - it lets people see at a glance what
            the problem
            is, it is used for searching for similar problems, and is
            used in
            reports of outstanding issues.


        Thanks for the reminder, I changed the subject in the bug
        tracker even
        though it's closed, for the benefit of those who are searching
        old bug
        reports.
        --
        cheers, J"org               .-.-.   --... ...--   -.. .  DL8DTL

        http://www.sax.de/~joerg/                        NIC: JW11-RIPE
        Never trust an operating system you don't have sources for. ;-)



    _________________________________________________
    AVR-libc-dev mailing list
    address@hidden <mailto:address@hidden>
    https://lists.nongnu.org/__mailman/listinfo/avr-libc-dev
    <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/avr-libc-dev>
reply via email to
[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]