avr-libc-dev
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[avr-libc-dev] Build of SVN trunk completely broken


From: Joerg Wunsch
Subject: [avr-libc-dev] Build of SVN trunk completely broken
Date: Wed, 28 Dec 2011 23:15:46 +0100
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14)

I intended to release avr-libc 1.8.0, as I've got downstream bug
reports for things that have long been fixed in SVN.

However, the current build is completely broken.  First, changeset
2257 break the build for architecture avr31, as it results in an
attempt to evaluate AVR_RAMPZ_ADDR for device AT43USB320.

So I decided to unpatch that for the moment (to eventually re-apply it
after the release).  However, next is:

avr-gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I../../..  -I../../../common -I../../../include 
-I../../../include  -I../../../common -I../../../include -I../../../include -x 
assembler-with-cpp -Wa,-gstabs -mmcu=avrtiny10 -D__COMPILING_AVR_LIBC__   -MT 
strlcat.o -MD -MP -MF .deps/strlcat.Tpo -c -o strlcat.o 
../../../libc/string/strlcat.S
../../../libc/string/strlcat.S: Assembler messages:
../../../libc/string/strlcat.S:99: Error: illegal opcode sbiw for mcu avrtiny10
gmake[5]: *** [strlcat.o] Error 1
gmake[5]: Leaving directory `/home/joerg/src/avr-libc/avr/lib/avrtiny10'
gmake[4]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
gmake[4]: Leaving directory `/home/joerg/src/avr-libc/avr/lib/avrtiny10'
gmake[3]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
gmake[3]: Leaving directory `/home/joerg/src/avr-libc/avr/lib'
gmake[2]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
gmake[2]: Leaving directory `/home/joerg/src/avr-libc/avr'
gmake[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
gmake[1]: Leaving directory `/home/joerg/src/avr-libc'
gmake: *** [all] Error 2

Hmm, I thought we don't pretend being able to compile library code for
ATtiny10-like devices at all?

I'm tired now, and just give up for now. :-(

-- 
cheers, J"org               .-.-.   --... ...--   -.. .  DL8DTL

http://www.sax.de/~joerg/                        NIC: JW11-RIPE
Never trust an operating system you don't have sources for. ;-)



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]