Re: [avr-libc-dev] Re: AVR-libc-dev Digest, Vol 99, Issue 13

[Joerg Wunsch]

As Bradley Jarvis wrote:

> I am happy to have a look at adding libstdc++ because I am quite
> interested in using exceptions, but I won't be able to get around to it
> for a few months. ...

> I have noticed that stdlibc++ is located in gcc not glibc, what were
> your ideas on implementing? I suppose because of the requirement to
> compile for the different avr architectures it should be located in
> avr-libc in a directory called libstdc++.

No, it's fine to have it in GCC.  It requires a two-stage compilation
of the toolchain: binutils first, then compiler with C++ support but
without libstdc++, then avr-libc, then compiler with libstdc++ once
more.

It wouldn't make sense for us to rewrite all that as part of avr-libc.
avr-libc merely replaces what normally would be the operating system's
C library.

-- 
cheers, J"org               .-.-.   --... ...--   -.. .  DL8DTL

http://www.sax.de/~joerg/                        NIC: JW11-RIPE
Never trust an operating system you don't have sources for. ;-)