RE: [avr-libc-dev] Missing Header File 'iom3000.h' From Latest Tarball

[Weddington, Eric]

Hi Bill,

Yeah, we're aware that there are some issues with 1.7.0, including issues with 
util/delay.h.

Many of these issues are now fixed in the latest SVN trunk of avr-libc (i.e. 
future 1.7.1).

We're working towards a release of 1.7.1 to hopefully get these fixes out to 
the wider public.

As an aside, I've heard of some issues with AVR GCC 4.5.x. You might want to 
check the GCC bug list for the avr bugs to see what's been reported. I think 
that the 4.4.x series has had more testing on the avr port, so it might be a 
bit more stable.

Also note that binutils 2.21 has just been released and AFAIK the avr patch set 
has not been updated for that version (I'm in the middle of doing that work). 
However 2.20.1 is the latest stable for the avr.

Eric Weddington

> -----Original Message-----
> From: address@hidden
> [mailto:address@hidden On
> Behalf Of Marr
> Sent: Tuesday, December 14, 2010 3:25 PM
> To: address@hidden
> Subject: [avr-libc-dev] Missing Header File 'iom3000.h' From Latest
> Tarball
> 
> Greetings,
> 
> I think the 'iom3000.h' header file is erroneously missing from the latest
> version of the 'avr-libc' tarball.
> 
> I downloaded from here:
> 
>    http://download.savannah.gnu.org/releases/avr-libc/avr-libc-
> 1.7.0.tar.bz2
> 
> My 'make' failed thusly:
> 
> In file included from ../../../../../common/macros.inc:39:0,
>                  from ../../../../../crt1/gcrt1.S:38:
> ../../../../../include/avr/io.h:419:27: fatal error: avr/iom3000.h: No
> such
> file or directory
> compilation terminated.
> 
> As a work-around, I just grabbed the 'iom3000.h' from CVS and the
> compilation
> now succeeds.
> 
> Now admittedly, I may be confused because I've been struggling on and off
> over
> the last couple of days to get the AVR toolchain built (on Slackware 13.1)
> from the latest source releases (binutils-2.21, gcc-core-4.5.1, avr-
> libc-1.7.0). In doing so, I've had to patch and later even hand-edit the
> 'avr-
> devices.c' file in the GCC 4.5.1 distribution, but I don't think anything
> I've
> done would have caused any problems.
> 
> Hope this information is useful (and that I'm not missing something
> obvious
> here) and that the missing header file can be added to the tarball.
> Thanks!
> 
> Regards,
> Bill Marr
> 
> _______________________________________________
> AVR-libc-dev mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/avr-libc-dev