|
From: | Boyapati, Anitha |
Subject: | RE: [avr-libc-dev] [bug #30363] _delay_xx() functions in <util/delay.h> are broken |
Date: | Thu, 7 Oct 2010 17:33:48 +0200 |
> >> >> Yes, the problem is figuring out which turns out to be least surpring :( > >My vote is for round up too, and it is the standard for delay functions >everywhere. See for instance: > >http://linux.die.net/man/3/usleep > >and notice the "(at least)" in the description. > This looks affirmative. Thanks Paulo! Regards Anitha
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |