Re: [avr-libc-dev] [bug #30363] _delay_xx() functions in <util/delay.h> are broken

[Bob Paddock]

> I think it can be argued either wise - "round up" or "round down". Both have
> trade-offs. When "round up" is used, the user might end up wondering why delay
> is a little more than what he bargained for.

Round Up might take a cycle or two or more than was  asked for, which
I doubt would surprise anyone.

Any amount less than what was  asked for might be a big surprise when
something goes terribly wrong because the delay was not long enough.

Always go for the operation of "Least Surprise".