Re: [avr-libc-dev] gcc4.6 vs avr-libc-1.6.8?

[dpc]

Joerg Wunsch <address@hidden> writes:

> As Weddington, Eric wrote:
>
>> I would actually suggest using GCC 4.4.3. It's gotten more testing
>> than the bleeding edge.
>
> Nevertheless, wouldn't an ICE be worth a (GCC) bug report anyway?

probably.

although this is a relatively new change (160312 was 2010-06-05) to
c-typeck.c and i lost track of what stage gcc trunk should be in.

\p
---
We work in the dark. We do what we can. We give what we have.
                - Henry James