RE: [avr-libc-dev] Inclusion of far pointer library (patch#6352)broke avr-libc build

[Weddington, Eric]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Weddington, Eric 
> Sent: Sunday, June 13, 2010 11:13 PM
> To: 'Joerg Wunsch'; address@hidden
> Subject: RE: [avr-libc-dev] Inclusion of far pointer library 
> (patch#6352)broke avr-libc build
> 
> I have to emphatically agree with Joerg on all of this.
> 
> AVR Freaks is not the place to discuss new features, it is 
> this mailing list.
> 
> In fact, I would almost suggest that the other progmem.h 
> features, other than the additional *_PF function that was 
> submitted, be *removed* until we have a chance to discuss the 
> feature, what it requires, pros and cons, and how it fits 
> into future planned work.
> 
> I wouldn't suggest posting a patch to the binutils folks as 
> they will defer it back to us as they won't be able to 
> properly judge whether or not an AVR-specific patch such as 
> these linker script additions would be a good thing or a bad thing.
> 
> Unless there are any immediate objections, I will be 
> preparing a patch to remove these additional progmem.h features.
> 

s/progmem/pgmspace/g

Can't keep my headers straight.