Re: [avr-libc-dev] USART_RXC_vect and USART_TXC_vect

[Karl Edler]

The reason why I wanted them unified was so that I could write one piece
of UART code that would work with all avr micro-controllers. If
both were listed then that would be possible. Otherwise my code has to
make the definitions. I think listing both would be good. (Ideally Atmel
would unify their names.)

On 05/13/2010 11:57 AM, Jan Waclawek wrote:
> Still, what would hurt to list both?
>
> Jan Waclawek
>
> ----- Original Message ---------------
>   
>> Good policy. Thanks.
>>
>>     
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I have noticed that iom16.h, iom323.h, iom32.h, and iom8.h all define
>>> USART_RXC_vect and USART_TXC_vect
>>> while the headers for other micro-controllers define
>>> USART_RX_vect and USART_TX_vect instead.
>>>
>>> I think that these definitions should be unified. Am I right?
>>>       
>
>
>   
>>> Our policy is to match whatever the datasheet uses.  As the datasheet
>>> of the ATmega16 & Co. used USART,TXC, we have it that way, too.
>>>
>>> I don't think anyone is going to modify these very old datasheets
>>> anymore.
>>>   
>>>       
>