RE: [avr-libc-dev] Adding (some) Procyon AVRlibfunctionalitytoavr-libc

[Weddington, Eric]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jan Waclawek [mailto:address@hidden 
> Sent: Friday, September 18, 2009 3:41 PM
> To: Ruddick Lawrence
> Cc: Weddington, Eric; address@hidden
> Subject: Re: [avr-libc-dev] Adding (some) Procyon 
> AVRlibfunctionalitytoavr-libc
> 
> On Fri, 18 Sep 2009 13:45:47 -0700
> Ruddick Lawrence <address@hidden> wrote:
> 
> > The confusion I was talking about with LibAVR was not with 
> the existing
> > Procyon library, but with avr-libc. Of course that only 
> becomes a problem if
> > they are indeed separate projects, which brings me to my 
> second point...
> 
> Want some crazy (but google-safe) names?
> 
> yalfa (yet another library for avr)

Personally I really hate anything with "yet another" in the name. And point to 
the legions of AVR libraries out that that warrants that this is "yet another" 
library.

> lidr, or avr-lidr (from library & drivers)
> bonbon (not really google-safe, but certainly good ;-) )
> 
> Count me into the "will contribute chaotically" group, unless 
> you insist on the CVS stuff, which I am not willing to learn 
> to use properly (I guess there might be more of us with this 
> attitude).

CVS is not that hard to learn, and it's a good skill to have. Here's the 
reference that I use:
http://cvsbook.red-bean.com/cvsbook.html

Once you know CVS, then Subversion is not that hard to learn.